Understanding AI Models
Choosing the right AI model is one of the most important decisions for your project. This guide covers all major providers, their models, and when to use each.
The AI Model Landscape
βββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ
β PROPRIETARY MODELS β
β ββββββββββββ ββββββββββββ ββββββββββββ ββββββββββββ β
β β OpenAI β βAnthropic β β Google β β Mistral β β
β β GPT-4o β β Claude β β Gemini β β Large β β
β ββββββββββββ ββββββββββββ ββββββββββββ ββββββββββββ β
βββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ€
β OPEN SOURCE MODELS β
β ββββββββββββ ββββββββββββ ββββββββββββ ββββββββββββ β
β β Llama β β Mistral β β Qwen β β Gemma β β
β β 3.1 β β 7B β β 2.5 β β 2 β β
β ββββββββββββ ββββββββββββ ββββββββββββ ββββββββββββ β
βββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββProprietary Model Providers
OpenAI
Company: OpenAI (San Francisco, USA) Founded: 2015 API: api.openai.com
| Model | Context | Input Cost | Output Cost | Best For |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GPT-4o | 128K | $2.50/1M | $10/1M | General tasks, vision |
| GPT-4o mini | 128K | $0.15/1M | $0.60/1M | Cost-effective tasks |
| o1 | 200K | $15/1M | $60/1M | Complex reasoning |
| o1-mini | 128K | $3/1M | $12/1M | STEM, coding |
Strengths:
- Industry-leading general intelligence
- Excellent at following instructions
- Strong vision capabilities
- Fastest inference speeds
- Extensive documentation and ecosystem
Weaknesses:
- More expensive than alternatives
- Data may be used for training (opt-out available)
- Rate limits on newer models
Best For: Production applications, general-purpose AI, vision tasks
Anthropic
Company: Anthropic (San Francisco, USA) Founded: 2021 API: api.anthropic.com
| Model | Context | Input Cost | Output Cost | Best For |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Opus 4 | 200K | $15/1M | $75/1M | Complex analysis |
| Claude Sonnet 4 | 200K | $3/1M | $15/1M | Balanced performance |
| Claude Haiku 3.5 | 200K | $0.25/1M | $1.25/1M | Fast, cheap tasks |
Strengths:
- Best-in-class for coding and analysis
- Largest context window (200K tokens)
- Strong safety and alignment
- Excellent at nuanced tasks
- Very honest about limitations
Weaknesses:
- Smaller ecosystem than OpenAI
- Can be overly cautious
- No official vision in all models
Best For: Coding assistance, long document analysis, research
Google (Gemini)
Company: Google DeepMind API: ai.google.dev
| Model | Context | Input Cost | Output Cost | Best For |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemini 2.0 Pro | 1M | $1.25/1M | $5/1M | Complex tasks |
| Gemini 2.0 Flash | 1M | $0.075/1M | $0.30/1M | Fast, multimodal |
| Gemini 1.5 Pro | 2M | $1.25/1M | $5/1M | Massive context |
Strengths:
- Largest context windows (up to 2M tokens)
- Native multimodal (text, image, video, audio)
- Excellent at code generation
- Deep Google integration
Weaknesses:
- API can be less intuitive
- Availability varies by region
- Less established for production
Best For: Multimodal tasks, massive documents, Google Cloud users
Mistral AI
Company: Mistral AI (Paris, France) Founded: 2023 API: api.mistral.ai
| Model | Context | Input Cost | Output Cost | Best For |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mistral Large | 128K | $2/1M | $6/1M | Complex reasoning |
| Mistral Small | 32K | $0.2/1M | $0.6/1M | Efficient tasks |
| Codestral | 32K | $0.2/1M | $0.6/1M | Code generation |
Strengths:
- European company (GDPR-friendly)
- Open weights for some models
- Excellent price/performance
- Strong multilingual support
Weaknesses:
- Smaller model selection
- Less documentation
- Newer ecosystem
Best For: European deployments, cost-conscious projects, multilingual
Open Source Models
Meta Llama
| Model | Parameters | Context | Hardware Needed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Llama 3.1 405B | 405B | 128K | 8x H100 |
| Llama 3.1 70B | 70B | 128K | 2x A100 or 4x RTX 4090 |
| Llama 3.1 8B | 8B | 128K | 16GB VRAM or 32GB RAM |
| Llama 3.2 3B | 3B | 128K | 8GB VRAM or 16GB RAM |
License: Llama 3.1 Community License (commercial use allowed)
Strengths:
- State-of-the-art open source quality
- Full control over your data
- No per-token costs
- Can fine-tune for your use case
Best For: Self-hosting, privacy-sensitive applications, custom training
Mistral (Open Weights)
| Model | Parameters | Context | Hardware Needed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mixtral 8x22B | 141B (active: 39B) | 64K | 2x A100 |
| Mixtral 8x7B | 47B (active: 13B) | 32K | 48GB VRAM |
| Mistral 7B | 7B | 32K | 16GB VRAM |
License: Apache 2.0 (fully open)
Best For: Efficient inference, MoE architecture experiments
Other Notable Open Source
| Model | Provider | Parameters | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen 2.5 | Alibaba | 0.5B-72B | Excellent multilingual |
| Gemma 2 | 2B-27B | Efficient, well-documented | |
| DeepSeek V3 | DeepSeek | 671B | Competitive with GPT-4 |
| Phi-3 | Microsoft | 3.8B-14B | Great for small deployments |
How to Choose
Decision Matrix
| Priority | Recommended |
|---|---|
| Best quality, cost not an issue | GPT-4o or Claude Opus 4 |
| Best value for money | Claude Sonnet 4 or GPT-4o mini |
| Coding and analysis | Claude Sonnet 4 |
| Privacy and self-hosting | Llama 3.1 70B |
| Fastest inference | GPT-4o or Gemini Flash |
| Longest documents | Gemini 1.5 Pro (2M context) |
| European compliance | Mistral Large |
| Running locally on laptop | Llama 3.2 3B or Mistral 7B |
By Use Case
Customer Support Bot β Claude Sonnet 4 (nuanced, safe) or GPT-4o mini (cheap, fast)
Code Assistant β Claude Sonnet 4 (best at code) or Codestral
Document Analysis β Gemini 1.5 Pro (massive context) or Claude (200K context)
Privacy-Sensitive Application β Self-hosted Llama 3.1
Startup on a Budget β GPT-4o mini or Claude Haiku
Running Open Source Models
With Ollama (Easiest)
# Install
curl -fsSL https://ollama.com/install.sh | sh
# Run Llama 3.1
ollama run llama3.1
# Run Mistral
ollama run mistralWith vLLM (Production)
pip install vllm
# Serve Llama 3.1 8B
python -m vllm.entrypoints.openai.api_server \
--model meta-llama/Meta-Llama-3.1-8B-InstructCloud GPU Options
| Provider | GPU | Cost/Hour | Best For |
|---|---|---|---|
| RunPod | A100 80GB | ~$2/hr | Development |
| Lambda Labs | H100 | ~$3/hr | Production |
| Vast.ai | Various | ~$0.50/hr | Budget |
Summary
The AI model landscape is rich with options. For most projects:
- Start with a proprietary API (OpenAI or Anthropic) for quick development
- Evaluate open source once you understand your needs
- Consider hybrid - use cloud APIs for complex tasks, local models for simple ones
See our Cost Estimation Guide to calculate your expected costs, or our Hosting Comparison to decide where to deploy.
Was this guide helpful?
Let us know how we can improve our documentation.