Understanding AI Models: A Complete Guide

Beginner

Learn the differences between OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, and open source AI models - which one is right for your project?

20 min
By Botsmann Team
January 12, 2026

Understanding AI Models

Choosing the right AI model is one of the most important decisions for your project. This guide covers all major providers, their models, and when to use each.

The AI Model Landscape

β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”
β”‚                    PROPRIETARY MODELS                        β”‚
β”‚  β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”  β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”  β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”  β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”    β”‚
β”‚  β”‚  OpenAI  β”‚  β”‚Anthropic β”‚  β”‚  Google  β”‚  β”‚ Mistral  β”‚    β”‚
β”‚  β”‚  GPT-4o  β”‚  β”‚  Claude  β”‚  β”‚  Gemini  β”‚  β”‚  Large   β”‚    β”‚
β”‚  β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜  β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜  β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜  β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜    β”‚
β”œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€
β”‚                    OPEN SOURCE MODELS                        β”‚
β”‚  β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”  β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”  β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”  β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”    β”‚
β”‚  β”‚  Llama   β”‚  β”‚ Mistral  β”‚  β”‚  Qwen    β”‚  β”‚  Gemma   β”‚    β”‚
β”‚  β”‚   3.1    β”‚  β”‚   7B     β”‚  β”‚   2.5    β”‚  β”‚    2     β”‚    β”‚
β”‚  β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜  β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜  β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜  β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜    β”‚
β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜

Proprietary Model Providers

OpenAI

Company: OpenAI (San Francisco, USA) Founded: 2015 API: api.openai.com

ModelContextInput CostOutput CostBest For
GPT-4o128K$2.50/1M$10/1MGeneral tasks, vision
GPT-4o mini128K$0.15/1M$0.60/1MCost-effective tasks
o1200K$15/1M$60/1MComplex reasoning
o1-mini128K$3/1M$12/1MSTEM, coding

Strengths:

  • Industry-leading general intelligence
  • Excellent at following instructions
  • Strong vision capabilities
  • Fastest inference speeds
  • Extensive documentation and ecosystem

Weaknesses:

  • More expensive than alternatives
  • Data may be used for training (opt-out available)
  • Rate limits on newer models

Best For: Production applications, general-purpose AI, vision tasks


Anthropic

Company: Anthropic (San Francisco, USA) Founded: 2021 API: api.anthropic.com

ModelContextInput CostOutput CostBest For
Claude Opus 4200K$15/1M$75/1MComplex analysis
Claude Sonnet 4200K$3/1M$15/1MBalanced performance
Claude Haiku 3.5200K$0.25/1M$1.25/1MFast, cheap tasks

Strengths:

  • Best-in-class for coding and analysis
  • Largest context window (200K tokens)
  • Strong safety and alignment
  • Excellent at nuanced tasks
  • Very honest about limitations

Weaknesses:

  • Smaller ecosystem than OpenAI
  • Can be overly cautious
  • No official vision in all models

Best For: Coding assistance, long document analysis, research


Google (Gemini)

Company: Google DeepMind API: ai.google.dev

ModelContextInput CostOutput CostBest For
Gemini 2.0 Pro1M$1.25/1M$5/1MComplex tasks
Gemini 2.0 Flash1M$0.075/1M$0.30/1MFast, multimodal
Gemini 1.5 Pro2M$1.25/1M$5/1MMassive context

Strengths:

  • Largest context windows (up to 2M tokens)
  • Native multimodal (text, image, video, audio)
  • Excellent at code generation
  • Deep Google integration

Weaknesses:

  • API can be less intuitive
  • Availability varies by region
  • Less established for production

Best For: Multimodal tasks, massive documents, Google Cloud users


Mistral AI

Company: Mistral AI (Paris, France) Founded: 2023 API: api.mistral.ai

ModelContextInput CostOutput CostBest For
Mistral Large128K$2/1M$6/1MComplex reasoning
Mistral Small32K$0.2/1M$0.6/1MEfficient tasks
Codestral32K$0.2/1M$0.6/1MCode generation

Strengths:

  • European company (GDPR-friendly)
  • Open weights for some models
  • Excellent price/performance
  • Strong multilingual support

Weaknesses:

  • Smaller model selection
  • Less documentation
  • Newer ecosystem

Best For: European deployments, cost-conscious projects, multilingual


Open Source Models

Meta Llama

ModelParametersContextHardware Needed
Llama 3.1 405B405B128K8x H100
Llama 3.1 70B70B128K2x A100 or 4x RTX 4090
Llama 3.1 8B8B128K16GB VRAM or 32GB RAM
Llama 3.2 3B3B128K8GB VRAM or 16GB RAM

License: Llama 3.1 Community License (commercial use allowed)

Strengths:

  • State-of-the-art open source quality
  • Full control over your data
  • No per-token costs
  • Can fine-tune for your use case

Best For: Self-hosting, privacy-sensitive applications, custom training


Mistral (Open Weights)

ModelParametersContextHardware Needed
Mixtral 8x22B141B (active: 39B)64K2x A100
Mixtral 8x7B47B (active: 13B)32K48GB VRAM
Mistral 7B7B32K16GB VRAM

License: Apache 2.0 (fully open)

Best For: Efficient inference, MoE architecture experiments


Other Notable Open Source

ModelProviderParametersNotes
Qwen 2.5Alibaba0.5B-72BExcellent multilingual
Gemma 2Google2B-27BEfficient, well-documented
DeepSeek V3DeepSeek671BCompetitive with GPT-4
Phi-3Microsoft3.8B-14BGreat for small deployments

How to Choose

Decision Matrix

PriorityRecommended
Best quality, cost not an issueGPT-4o or Claude Opus 4
Best value for moneyClaude Sonnet 4 or GPT-4o mini
Coding and analysisClaude Sonnet 4
Privacy and self-hostingLlama 3.1 70B
Fastest inferenceGPT-4o or Gemini Flash
Longest documentsGemini 1.5 Pro (2M context)
European complianceMistral Large
Running locally on laptopLlama 3.2 3B or Mistral 7B

By Use Case

Customer Support Bot β†’ Claude Sonnet 4 (nuanced, safe) or GPT-4o mini (cheap, fast)

Code Assistant β†’ Claude Sonnet 4 (best at code) or Codestral

Document Analysis β†’ Gemini 1.5 Pro (massive context) or Claude (200K context)

Privacy-Sensitive Application β†’ Self-hosted Llama 3.1

Startup on a Budget β†’ GPT-4o mini or Claude Haiku


Running Open Source Models

With Ollama (Easiest)

# Install
curl -fsSL https://ollama.com/install.sh | sh

# Run Llama 3.1
ollama run llama3.1

# Run Mistral
ollama run mistral

With vLLM (Production)

pip install vllm

# Serve Llama 3.1 8B
python -m vllm.entrypoints.openai.api_server \
    --model meta-llama/Meta-Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct

Cloud GPU Options

ProviderGPUCost/HourBest For
RunPodA100 80GB~$2/hrDevelopment
Lambda LabsH100~$3/hrProduction
Vast.aiVarious~$0.50/hrBudget

Summary

The AI model landscape is rich with options. For most projects:

  1. Start with a proprietary API (OpenAI or Anthropic) for quick development
  2. Evaluate open source once you understand your needs
  3. Consider hybrid - use cloud APIs for complex tasks, local models for simple ones

See our Cost Estimation Guide to calculate your expected costs, or our Hosting Comparison to decide where to deploy.

Was this guide helpful?

Let us know how we can improve our documentation.

Ready to Build?

Put what you've learned into practice. Start building your AI infrastructure today.